The Role of the Prosecutor's Office in Safeguarding State/Regional Assets as an Efforts to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ricky Setiawan Anas Borobudur University
  • Faisal Santiago Borobudur University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i3.188

Keywords:

Criminal Acts, Role of the Prosecutor's Office, State/Regional Assets

Abstract

The office of the prosecutor, in its efforts to combat corruption, needs to collaborate with the Attorney General's Office, the High Prosecutor's Office, and the District Attorney's Office to protect and reclaim state financial losses. The research aims to understand the role of the prosecutor's office in asset recovery to prevent corruption crimes in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical. The findings indicate that asset recovery starts from monitoring the wealth of potential suspects and is followed by an investigation. The government should put in place measures to prevent crime, such as verifying the identities of public officials and their families and monitoring their bank accounts to stop the laundering of criminal proceeds. In 2022, the prosecutor's office successfully recovered IDR 39.207 trillion and has recovered by 2024 of IDR 23 trillion. The conquest demonstrates the effectiveness of the prosecutor's office challenges, including a lack of witnesses, limited resources, lengthy audit processes, inadequate indictment applications, differences in understanding between prosecutors and judges, and difficulties in asset seizure and tracking.

Downloads

References

Evi Hartanti, 2a Korupsi, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, hlm 9

Chaerudin et.al, 2009, Strategi Pencegahan dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Refika Aditama: Bandung, hlm 4

Tim Redaksi Sinar Grafika, 2012, Undang – Undang Kejaksaan, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, hlm 16

Andi Hamzah, 2006, Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, hlm 20

Agus Kasiyanto, 2018, Teori dan Praktik Sistem Peradilan Tipikor Terpadu di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, hlm 26

Marwan Effendy, 2005, Kejaksaan RI, Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, hlm 32

D. Petrus Soerjowinoto, Buku Panduan Metode Penulisan Karya Hukum (MPKH) dan Skripsi. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum,UNIKA Soegijapranata, 2006.

R. H. Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 1988.

Ilham Gunawan, 1994, Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Menegakkan Hukum dan Stabilitas Politik. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, hlm 43

Adami Chazawi, 2016, Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, hlm 42

R. Susilo. 1984. Tugas Kewajiban dan Wewenang Penyidik, Jaksa, Hakim (Dalam Penhyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP). Politeia, Bogor, hlm 23

Oka, 1993, Undang-Undang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Menetapkan Kedudukan dan Peranan Kejaksaan, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, hlm 49

Purwaning M. Yanuar, 2007, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung, hlm 20.

Tirta Amidjaja, Kedudukan Hakim dan Jaksa. Pembangunan, Jakarta, hlm 29

Surachmin dan Cahaya Suhandi. 2011, Strategi & Teknik Korupsi, mengetahui untuk mencegah, Sinar Grafika, jakarta, hlm 29.

O.C. Kaligis, Pengawasan terhadap Jaksa Selaku Penyidik Tindak Pidana Khusus dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi, PT. Alumni, Bandung, hlm 52

Saleh Abdurahman, 2006, Media Informasi Masyarakat Hukum, Kejaksaan Agung R.I, Jakarta, hlm 79

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Ricky Setiawan Anas, & Faisal Santiago. (2024). The Role of the Prosecutor’s Office in Safeguarding State/Regional Assets as an Efforts to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia . International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 1(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i3.188