Analysis Of The Implementation Of Law N0. 24 Year 2011 Concerning BPJS Employment In Protecting Workers In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i4.265Keywords:
Implementation, Law, BPJS, WorkersAbstract
This research aims to analyze the extent of the implementation of Law No. 24/2011 concerning BPJS Employment in providing protection for workers in Indonesia. The focus of this research is to assess whether the implementation of the policy is in accordance with the expected objectives, as well as to identify factors that affect its success or failure. To identify various obstacles and barriers faced in the implementation of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, both from the side of the workforce, the employer, and the government. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method. The descriptive qualitative method was chosen because it aims to describe and analyze the implementation of Law No. 24/2011 in the implementation of the Employment BPJS program and to identify various obstacles, barriers, and their effectiveness in protecting the workforce. Through this approach, the research focuses on in-depth exploration of existing phenomena, utilizing qualitative primary and secondary data. The results of the study explain that BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, which is regulated in Law No. 24 of 2011, plays an important role in providing social protection for workers in Indonesia through various programs such as Old Age Security (JHT), Pension Security (JP), Work Accident Security (JKK), and Death Security (JKM). However, the implementation of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan still faces obstacles, such as low participation of informal sector workers, lack of understanding of BPJS benefits, and complicated claim procedures. To increase its effectiveness, more intensive efforts are needed in socialization to workers and job information providers, as well as simplifying administrative procedures. In addition, the government and BPJS must utilize technology to facilitate access and claim submission. Strict law enforcement against companies that do not comply with their obligations will guarantee compliance and ensure more equitable social protection for all workers in Indonesia.Downloads
References
Aspan, H., Setiawan, A., Wahyuni, E. S., Prabowo, A., & Zahara, A. N. (2023). Cyber Notary Issues Authority Certificate to Provide Legal Protection in Online Selling. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1801-e1801.
Barr, N. (2020). Economics of The Welfare State. Oxford University Press, USA.
Brodjonegoro, B. P., Nazara, S., & Zen, F. (2016). Policy challenges in Indonesian social security. In Age Related Pension Expenditure and Fiscal Space (pp. 137-151). Routledge.
Edi, H., & binti Salleh, R. (2023). Management of Worker Protection Regarding the Cancellation of the Decision of the Governor of Jakarta in Postponing the Implementation of the Minimum Wage. The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, 1 (2), 50-59.
Fadhiah, C. A., & Kamilah, K. (2024). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Yang Tidak Di Daftarkan Oleh Perusahaan Sebagai Peserta Bpjs Ketenagakerjaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 Tentang Badan Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Sosial. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5 (2), 3114-3119.
Hadiyat, Y. (2024). Reconstruction of the Social Security System Policy in National Development of Indonesia. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 6(1), 1-9.
Hanifah, I. (2023). A Policy Labor's Age of Safety in The Perspective of Theory Legal Protection. Quality-Access to Success, 24 (192).
Hidayah, N. P. (2020). Comparative study of legal protection for migrant workers in participation of social security programs in Indonesia and Singapore. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 28(1), 47-59.
Imaniyah, B. (2019). The Contract of the Social Security Agency for Employment (BPJS Ketenagakerjaan) in The Perspective of Shar {î} a Economic Law. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 14, 124-45.
Kurniasih, E., & Milandry, A. D. (2022). Implikasi Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Harian Lepas. JKIH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 1 (2), 176-193.
Mardianto, S. E. (2024). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Buruh/Pekerja Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 7 (1), 160-169.
Prajnaparamita, K. (2018). Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Anak. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1 (2), 215-230.
Rachmaniah, A. (2023). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Agung (Ma) Terhadap Tata Kelola Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (Bpjs) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung (Ma) Nomor 7 P/HUM/2020 (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS SULTAN AGENG TIRTAYASA).
Said, M. Y., & Nurhayati, Y. (2021). A review on Rawls Theory of Justice. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 1 (1), 29-36.
Sari, H. R. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Oleh Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.