Reformation Government and Role Political Law in Forming Public Policy

Authors

  • Hotman Manullang Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi Medan
  • Tamaulina Br. Sembiring Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi Medan
  • Ismidar Ismidar Universitas Pembangunan Pancabudi Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i4.294

Keywords:

Reformation Layout Manage, Policy Public, Dynamics Law-Politics, Interaction Political-Legal, Model of Governance Manage .

Abstract

Studies This investigate connection between change order manage And strength law-politics Which to form policy public. Studies This explore influence from change governance the current government in progress to design and implementation policy public with background behind reform order manage moment This . For analyze various subject, study This use study qualitative with analysis document And study literature in a way comprehensive. Framework theoretical in study This covers knowledge about governance changes, which include various models and their impacts. At the same time, the idea about dynamics law-politics investigated , highlighted How problem law interact with process political For to form results policy public. Study This to study world post reform through thorough data analysis, analyzing change policy public and its performance. Research This Also to study role component law-politics in making policy, highlighting contribution, obstacle, and the problems that faced. Findings This highlight existence relatedness between reform government And strength legal-political, so that give outlook about landscape policy the public who are developing. Study This add better understanding Good about impact governance changes and complex processes involvement law-politics in development policy public. The maker policy will get benefit from consequence This , Which will give outlook important for order manage And formation more policies effective . The proposal emphasize areas that need achieved in reform future governance and consolidation not quite enough answer law-politics in evolution policy public Which currently ongoing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, D. J. (2017). Importance of participation and the role of institutional politics in the policy-making process. Journal of Knowledge Administration, 17–35.

Ansori, L. (2017). Reformation enforcement law: A perspective on progressive law. Journal of Legal, 4(2), 148–163.

Budianto, A. M. (2016). Development of political law post-reformation in Indonesia. Iurual Lex Librum, 3(1), 429–444.

Dear Sir, A. (2017). Political law education national: An analysis of political law in the time of reformation. Journal Constitution, 14(2), 332–350.

Fitriana, M. K. (2015). The role of political law in the formation of regulation and legislation in Indonesia as a means to realize the objectives of the country (laws and regulations in Indonesia as the means of realizing the country’s goal).

Frenky. (2011). Political law and its role in legal development in Indonesia post-reformation. Journal of Law and Economy Sharia, Journal of Political.

Makhfudz, M. (2017). Government reformation but no reformists. Fair: Journal of Law, 8(1).

Mayrudin, Y. M., Husna, N. A., & Yuliati, F. R. (2020). Contesting formal and informal leadership in public policy and political daily life. Journal of Political Issue, 2(1), 1–9.

Mohammad, K., Izzatusholekha, & Putra, N. (2021). Dynamics of politics in reformation and public administration. Kais Study Knowledge Social, 141–157.

Mustari, N. (2015). Understanding public policy. Yogyakarta: Leutikapro.

Ramadan, A., & Ramadan, M. A. (2017). Draft general implementation policy public.

Risnawan, W. (2017). Role and function of political infrastructure in the formation of public policy. Journal of Scientific Knowledge Administration State, 511–518.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-07

How to Cite

Hotman Manullang, Tamaulina Br. Sembiring, & Ismidar Ismidar. (2024). Reformation Government and Role Political Law in Forming Public Policy. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 1(4), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v1i4.294