Data Arbitration in the Digital Economy: The Need for a Specialized Data Dispute Arbitration Forum in Indonesia

Authors

  • Firman Nurdiyansyah Sunandar Langlangbuana University
  • Andri Herman Setiawan Langlangbuana University
  • Ahmad Juaeni Langlangbuana University
  • Johannes Triestanto Langlangbuana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.722

Keywords:

Data Dispute Arbitration, Personal Data Protection, Online Dispute Resolution, Institutional Design

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Indonesia’s digital economy and the enactment of the Personal Data Protection Law (Law 27/2022) have exposed significant shortcomings in the resolution of data-related disputes under existing judicial and administrative frameworks. Public adjudication of sensitive data conflicts can erode trust, impose reputational damage, and delay reparative outcomes, while courts often lack specialized expertise in technology and privacy. Drawing upon international precedents including the European Data Protection Board’s Article 65 GDPR mechanism, the EU–US Data Privacy Framework arbitration annex, and the European Patent Office’s data-protection arbitration rules this study examines the urgency and feasibility of establishing a dedicated Data Dispute Arbitration Forum in Indonesia. Through comparative analysis, it identifies core design elements such as expert-appointed tribunals, streamlined online procedures, confidentiality safeguards, clear enforcement under the New York Con-vention, and mechanisms for restorative remedies beyond fines. Anchored in Pancasila’s social-justice ethos and Indonesia’s ADR law (Law 30/1999) and ITE Law, the proposed institutional architecture integrates online dispute resolution (ODR) protocols, data-minimization and cybersecurity guidelines, and publicly anonymized award publication to foster legal certainty and raise awareness of data-protection obligations. A stakeholder impact assessment demonstrates that such a forum would benefit individual data subjects through low-cost, expeditious relief; controllers and processors through predictability and trade-secret protection; regulators through expert findings; and foreign investors through alignment with global data-governance standards. By aligning domestic legal values with international best practices, the specialized forum promises to bolster enforcement, restore public trust, and strengthen Indonesia’s competitiveness in the global digital marketplace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. I. P. Organization, “ADR and Data Disputes Webinar,” 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.wipo.int/documents/d/amc/docs-en-adr_datadisputes.pdf%5B1

J. Chaisse, “Arbitration in cross-border data protection disputes,” J. Int. Disput. Settl., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 534–551, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idae018

M. F. Aziz and M. A. Hidayah, “Perlunya Pengaturan Khusus Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) Di Indonesia Untuk Fasilitasi Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce,” J. Rechts Vinding Media Pembin. Huk. Nas., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 275, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449.

G. Natarajan Ramani, “One size doesn’t fit all: the General Data Protection Regulation vis-à-vis international commercial arbitration,” Arbitr. Int., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 613–630, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1093/arbint/aiaa032

D. D. R. Desinta, “The Pancasila in the Age of Digital Society 5.0: Indonesia Legal System Perspective,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.21070/ijler.v19i1.996.

A. M. Cahayani, Naisyila Desnita Saputra, Putri Agustin Sulistyowati, Fatimah Nur Azizah, M. Nasoha, and A. N. Atqiya, “Pancasila dalam Tata Kelola Ekonomi Digital Global: Studi Hukum Internasional terhadap Perdagangan Elektronik,” Aliansi J. Hukum, Pendidik. Dan Sos. Hum., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 80–89, 2025, doi: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.993.

A. Amzulian, “The Future of Arbitration for Personal Data Disputes in Indonesia: Weighing the Benefits and Challenges,” Media Iuris, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 215–238, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.20473/mi.v8i2.63060.

A. M. Wibowo, “Perbandingan Hukum Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Online Indonesia Dan Cina,” Audit. Comp. Law J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 110–118, May 2021, doi: 10.22219/aclj.v2i2.16372.

S. Susilowardani, “Reconstruction of Online Dispute Resolution in Indonesian Regulation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference On Law, Economic & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2023), 2024, pp. 644–648. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_107.

M. M. Rohman, N. Mu’minin, M. Masuwd, and E. Elihami, “Methodological Reasoning Finds Law Using Normative Studies (Theory, Approach and Analysis of Legal Materials),” MAQASIDI J. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 204–221, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379.

M. Mitchell, “Analyzing the law qualitatively,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 102–113, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/QRJ-04-2022-0061.

M. R. Saputra and W. Setiadi, “Implementation Of General Principles Of Good Government In The Organization Of The 2024 Elections,” Int. J. Law Soc., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 94–112, May 2024, doi: 10.62951/ijls.v1i3.65.

Z. Claudia, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perlindungan Data Pribadi Melalui Arbitrase di Era Society 5.0,” J. Supremasi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 114–129, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.2794.

M. Kinnear and C. Molina Esteban, “Piero Bernardini’s Legacy in Investment Arbitration: the Philip Morris v Uruguay Case,” in Ar-bitration as Balanced Administration of Justice, Brill | Nijhoff, 2024, pp. 283–307. doi: 10.1163/9789004694910_016.

A. F. P. Dewa and F. Wiryani, “Implementation of International Arbitration in Settlement of Investment Disputes: Challenges and Opportunities in Indonesia,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (5th Inclar 2024), 2025, pp. 102–107. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-362-7_16.

M. Novović, “Arbitrability of Data Protection Disputes: Personal Data, Personalized Justice?,” Eur. Rev. Contract Law, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 215–238, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1515/ercl-2023-2012.

S. Muarif, “Transformasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Online Dispute Resolution (Odr): Tinjauan Efektivitas Pengadilan Virtual Di Indonesia Tahun 2025,” Law, Dev. Justice Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–84, May 2025, doi: 10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.69-84.

A. Patel, R. Ranjan, R. K. Kumar, N. Ojha, and A. Patel, “Online dispute resolution mechanism as an effective tool for resolving cross-border consumer disputes in the era of E-commerce,” Int. J. Law Manag., May 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-07-2024-0245.

I. G. A. Kurniawan, P. A. Samsithawrati, N. K. S. Dharmawan, F. P. Disantara, and R. Chansrakaeo, “Legal Reform in Business Dispute Resolution: A Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand,” J. Law Leg. Reform, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 569–616, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.15294/jllr.v6i2.21128.

A. D. Astri, H. Harmono, and D. T. Fathurohman, “The Effectiveness of The Use of Arbitration as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution in Indonesia,” J. Legisci, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 396–403, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.62885/legisci.v2i6.764.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Firman Nurdiyansyah Sunandar, Andri Herman Setiawan, Ahmad Juaeni, & Johannes Triestanto. (2025). Data Arbitration in the Digital Economy: The Need for a Specialized Data Dispute Arbitration Forum in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2(3), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.722