An Inconsistent Corrective Path: The Constitutional Court's Role as a Positive Legislator in Designing Indonesia's Simultaneous Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.758Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Election Design, Jurisprudential Inconsistency, Legal Certainty, Positive LegislatorAbstract
This research examines the design of simultaneous elections in Indonesia as its main research object, a crucial discourse spurred by the persistent inefficiencies of a separated election model that produced divided governments. The discourse is marked by the shifting jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court (MK). The primary problem addressed is the Court’s jurisprudential inconsistency, which creates significant legal uncertainty for election organizers and political actors. Therefore, the objective of this research is to critically analyze the evolution of the Court's rulings on this matter and their impact on its shifting role into a positive legislator. This study employs a normative-juridical method, focusing on the doctrinal analysis of primary legal materials, particularly the series of relevant Constitutional Court rulings. The analysis reveals an inconsistent jurisprudential journey, starting from an activist stance that imposed a five-ballot simultaneous model through Ruling 14/PUU-XI/2013, with the aim of strengthening the presidential system. Then, in response to the systemic chaos and humanitarian costs of the 2019 election, the Court retreated to an "open legal policy" doctrine in Ruling 55/PUU-XVII/2019, exhibiting judicial self-restraint by deferring the choice of an alternative model to the legislature. Finally, it abandoned this position in a final interventionist decision, Decicion 135/PUU-XXII/2024, which stipulated a specific model separating national and regional elections. The main finding confirms that this latest ruling positions the MK as a positive legislator, significantly overstepping its traditional judicial authority. It is concluded that although the final ruling substantively produces a more rational election design, its inconsistent formation process has fundamentally undermined the principles of legal certainty and the balance of powers, thereby creating a problematic precedent for the future of Indonesia's constitutional governance.
Downloads
References
Herbert Feith, “(2007). The decline of constitutional democracy in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. pp. 25 doi: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780804779089
Miriam Budiardjo, (2008). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik (Edisi Revisi). Gramedia Pustaka Utama, pp. 15.
Harold Crouch, (2007). The army and politics in Indonesia (Revised ed.). Equinox Publishing. Pp. 22. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812304938
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2005) Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, pp.180–85
Titi Anggraini, (2020), "The Quest for Electoral Integrity in Indonesia: The Role of Jurdil Principles," Indonesian Journal of Electoral Law vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–50.
Marcus Mietzner, (2015), Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi's Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia, Honolulu: East-West Center, pp. 18–22
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013, Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, 23 Januari 2014, pp. 150.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013, Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, 23 Januari 2014, pp. 152–56.
Miriam Budiardjo, (2008), Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik (Edisi Revisi), Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, pp. 410-412
Didik Supriyanto, (2019) Independensi Penyelenggara Pemilu: Jaminan Konstitusional dan Tantangan Praktis, Jurnal Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola Pemilu Volume 4, No. 2, November 2019, pp. 215.
Lihat analisis mendalam dalam Perludem, Catatan Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019: Meninjau Ulang Desain Keserentakan, (Jakarta: Perludem, 2019), pp. 55
Khoirunnisa Nur Agustyati, "Kompleksitas Surat Suara dan Dampaknya Terhadap Suara Tidak Sah dalam Pemilu 2019," Jurnal Studi Pemilu dan Demokrasi, Volume 7, No. 1 (Juni 2019): pp. 30.
August Mellaz, Surat Suara Pemilihan Anggota Dpr/Dprd Di Pemilu 2019: Praktek Dan Evaluasi, Jurnal Bawaslu (ERE), Volume 2, Nomor 2, 2020, pp. 17.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Laporan Tahunan 2019, (Jakarta: Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal MKRI, 2020), pp. 48.
Saldi Isra, (2020), Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, dan Perkembangannya, Depok: Rajawali Pers, pp. 250.
Titi Anggraini dan Hadar Nafis Gumay (eds.), (2019), Menata Ulang Desain Pemilu Serentak: Kajian dan Usulan Model, Jakarta: Perludem, pp. 112-115.
Lihat amar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 yang dibacakan pada awal tahun 2025
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2005), Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, pp. 88-90.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (1994), Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Konstitusi dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, pp. 210–15
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2005), Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara Jakarta: Konstitusi, pp. 115–20
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (2012), Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, pp. 290
Bagir Manan, (2004), Hukum Positif Indonesia (Satu Kajian Teoretik), Yogyakarta: UII Press, pp. 112.
Andrew Reynolds, Ben Reilly, and Andrew Ellis, (2005) Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp. 14-19
Leo Suryadinata, (2002), Elections and Politics in Indonesia, Singapura: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 145–50.
Edward Aspinall, (2010), The Irony of Success: The New Normal of Indonesian Democracy, Journal of Democracy vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 20–34
Saldi Isra, (2020), Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, dan Perkembangannya, Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020, pp. 250
Titi Anggraini dan Hadar Nafis Gumay (eds.), (2019), Menata Ulang Desain Pemilu Serentak: Kajian dan Usulan Model, Jakarta: Perludem, pp. 112-115.
Bivitri Susanti, Jalan Buntu Open Legal Policy: Judicial Activism MK dalam Desain Pemilu, Jurnal Hukum Konstitusi Progresif, Volume 3, No. 1, pp. 40-42
Feri Amsari, (2023), Tirani Konstitusi: Catatan Kritis atas Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi, Yogyakarta: PUSH-UP, pp. 95.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, (2024), Ketika Mahkamah Menjadi Raja: Bahaya Otokrasi Yudisial di Negara Demokrasi, Jurnal Veritas et Justitia, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 210
Lihat Putusan MK No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024, khususnya pada bagian pertimbangan hukum dan amar putusan yang menetapkan tenggat waktu bagi pembentuk undang-undang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
