Legal Protection of Suspects’ Rights During the Investigation Stage Viewed from the Principle of Due Process of Law in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v3i1.873Keywords:
Criminal Investigation, Due Process of Law, Human Rights Protection, KUHAP, Suspects’ RightsAbstract
The protection of suspects’ rights during the investigation phase is a fundamental component of a fair and effective criminal justice system. This study examines the implementation of the principle of due process of law in Indonesia and its implications for safeguarding human rights in criminal investigations. Utilizing a normative legal research approach, supported by statutory and conceptual analysis, the research evaluates both the legal framework and practical application of suspects’ rights under the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the 1945 Constitution, and international human rights instruments such as the ICCPR. Findings indicate that while Indonesia has established comprehensive regulations to protect suspects, the practical implementation remains inconsistent due to structural, cultural, and procedural challenges. Deviations such as limited access to legal counsel, incomplete documentation of interrogations, and occasional coercive practices undermine adherence to due process standards. The study highlights the critical need for regulatory improvements, capacity building for investigators, and strengthened supervision mechanisms to ensure full protection of suspects’ rights. Enhancing the conformity of investigative practices with due process principles is essential not only for safeguarding individual rights but also for maintaining public trust and the integrity of the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Ashworth, A. (2006). Principles of criminal law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2010). The criminal process (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Chemerinsky, E. (2019). Constitutional law: Principles and policies (6th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Fair Trials International. (2016). Inside police custody: An empirical account of suspects’ rights. Fair Trials.
Friedman, L. M. (2019). Law and society: An introduction (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Goldstein, H. (2001). Policing a free society. Oxford University Press.
Hall, K. L., Ely, J. W., & Grossman, J. B. (2014). The Oxford companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP. Sinar Grafika.
Joseph, S., & Castan, M. (2013). The international covenant on civil and political rights: Cases, materials, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. (2021). Laporan tahunan hak asasi manusia. Komnas HAM.
Muladi. (2009). Hak asasi manusia, politik, dan sistem peradilan pidana. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Nowak, M. (2005). U.N. covenant on civil and political rights: CCPR commentary (2nd ed.). N. P. Engel.
Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford University Press.
Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Spronken, T., & Attinger, M. (2011). Procedural rights in criminal proceedings. Intersentia.
Spronken, T., et al. (2016). EU procedural rights in criminal proceedings. Intersentia.
United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2007). General Comment No. 32: Article 14 Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial. United Nations.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2014). Handbook on police accountability, oversight and integrity. United Nations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
