Ius Contituedum Regulation of the Substance of Police Repressive Actions in Protests that Result in Riots

Authors

  • Ryan Sukma Wibawa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Fence M. Wantu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Dian Ekawty Ismail Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v3i1.911

Keywords:

Authority, Protest, Public Order, Repressive Action, Riot

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyze the legality and limits of police repressive actions against protests that resulted in riots. This type of research is normative legal research with a legislative approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis used in this study is an analytical descriptive technique. The results of the research show that the law is always used as a guideline in limiting all citizens' behavior to stay on the right path. Protests often lead to riots, destruction of public facilities, attacks on officers, and violations of public order, so that there is a criminal threat for protesters who do not maintain order and security. The regulation of police repressive actions in protests that result in chaos still needs special refinement in the context of protests, among which the substance of repressive actions must also harmonize technological developments and digitalization in security maintenance. The rules need to be updated by adding objective indicators of threats, public accountability mechanisms, transparent documentation obligations, measurable proportionality standards, and room for recovery for victims of abuse of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anisa. (2021). Repressive actions of police officers in dealing with community demonstrations. Journal of Pancasila Education and Citizenship Research, 1(8).

Buldani, M. N. (2025). A study of criminal law and human rights against acts of violence by officers in protests. Global Education Scientific Journal, 6(3).

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Indonesian Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).

Ismail, D. E., et al. (2023). The concept of revitalizing traditional institutions in the criminal law system to realize restorative justice. Jambura Law Review, 5(2).

Kadir, Y., et al. (2022). The application of Fixed Procedure No. 1 of 2010 concerning anarchist countermeasures. Journal Evidence of Law, 1(2).

Kurniawan Susilo, D., et al. (2021). Analysis of on-the-spot shootings carried out by police members against criminal offenders in an effort to enforce criminal law. Legality: A Journal of Law, 13(2).

Law No. 12 of 2005 concerning the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning human rights.

Law No. 9 of 1998 concerning freedom of expression in public.

Najib, Z. K. A. (2012). Legal consequences of termination of investigation of criminal cases and their problems in practice. Diponegoro Law Review, 1(4).

Permanent Procedure of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police No. Protap/1/X/2010 concerning countermeasures of anarchism.

Puluhulawa, F. U., & Harun, A. A. (2021). Legal research methods. UII Press.

Purnama, I. K. A. (2018). Historical police law and the role of the national police in law enforcement and human rights protection. PT Aditama Review.

Purwani, P. B. T., & Resen, M. G. S. K. (2022). The authority of the national police in handling anarchist protests. Kertha Speech Journal, 11(2).

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Law enforcement as a sociological review. Genta Publishing.

Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police No. 1 of 2009 concerning the use of force in police actions.

Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police No. 16 of 2006 concerning guidelines for crowd control.

Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police No. 7 of 2012 concerning the submission of opinions in public.

Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police No. 8 of 2010 concerning procedures for handling riots.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Factors influencing law enforcement. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tampubolon, S., & Yusela, D. (2025). Juridical review of the use of crowd control weapons (rubber bullets and tear gas) by the police in dealing with demonstrations. Journal of Legal Studies and Civic Education, 2(1).

Wantu, F. M., et al. (2024). The philosophy of law as a reflection. UII Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

Ryan Sukma Wibawa, Fence M. Wantu, & Dian Ekawty Ismail. (2026). Ius Contituedum Regulation of the Substance of Police Repressive Actions in Protests that Result in Riots. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v3i1.911