Indonesia's Struggle For Democratic Resilience: Issues and Institutional Reforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.379Keywords:
Indonesian democracy, democratic backsliding, identity politics, political dynasties, democratic reformAbstract
Indonesia's democracy, despite over two decades of progress since the fall of the New Order regime, has faced stagnation and democratic backsliding in recent years. Indicators from institutions such as the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Freedom House, and Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) consistently highlight a decline in democratic quality. Contributing factors include identity politics, declining electoral integrity, political dynasties, and weak institutional capacities, described as "Low-Capacity Democracy." This study employs a qualitative approach to explore these challenges, including literature reviews, document analysis, and interviews. The findings reveal systemic issues at both institutional and societal levels, including weakened oversight bodies like the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the dominance of executive power, and the rise of transactional politics and political dynasties. Digital challenges, such as disinformation and low digital literacy, also exacerbate these issues. This study recommends comprehensive reforms, such as strengthening independent institutions, enhancing transparency in public fund management, and improving political education to reduce transactional practices. Digital media regulations and technology-based electoral monitoring are also proposed to increase transparency. By addressing these issues, Indonesia can reinforce democratic resilience and foster an inclusive, accountable political system.
Downloads
References
Aspinall, E. (2013). Indonesian Democracy and the Problem of Oligarchy. Southeast Asian Studies.
Bungin B. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo; 2017.
A. Guan et al., ‘Combining Mixed Methods and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches to Identify Neighborhood-Level Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic’, J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1177/15586898231222037.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
E. E. Saputra, ‘Pemilih Muda Menanti Solusi Masalah Ketenagakerjaan dari Capres’, Kompas, 2024.
W. Yustisia, ‘Persona Politik Pemilih Muda’, Kompas, 2023. Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412
Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Democracy Index 2023: Age of conflict. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com
Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the world 2023: Democracy under siege. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2023). Democracy’s surprising resilience. Journal of Democracy, 34(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.0000
Mietzner, M. (2021). Democratic deconsolidation in Southeast Asia. Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677080
Muhtadi, B. (2018). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94821-6
York, N., Tower, A., & Kong, H. (2024). Democracy Index (2023). Age of conflict. Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com
V-Democracy Institute. (2024). Democracy Report 2024: Autocratization turns viral. Retrieved from https://v-dem.net
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.