Legal Review of Consumer Dispute Settlement in Cases of Cancelled Property Development

Study Decision Number : 072/ Arbitration /2022/ BPSK.Mdn

Authors

  • Andreas Marfel Silaban Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Beby Sendy Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.412

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Consumers, BPSK, Property

Abstract

Consumer dispute resolution in Indonesia is an increasingly relevant issue, considering the high dynamics of transactions that occur in the goods and services sector, including in the property sector. Consumers, as the weaker party in business transactions, often face problems related to the quality of goods/services received, delays, unilateral cancellations, or even failure in property development. Therefore, resolving consumer disputes is very important and requires adequate legal protection. This type of research is normative juridical research. Normative research is literature research by examining theoretical approaches and concepts that examine consumer disputes. Normative juridical research is legal research that places law as a building system of norms. Problems arise when consumers in good faith have paid all Down Payment obligations, but the business actor actually takes a unilateral decision to cancel the apartment construction project. Consumers who have invested funds amounting to IDR 307,530,900 are trying to get a refund, but the business actor does not show responsiveness and good faith in the refund process. This situation finally forced consumers to take legal action by filing a lawsuit with BPSK Medan City on December 5 2022. This case is a clear example of the application of consumer protection and the importance of BPSK as an alternative for resolving disputes outside of court. This decision also reflects the principles of justice and legal certainty in consumer disputes, where agreed consumers can obtain their rights through an arbitration mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sutedi, A. (2018). Product responsibility in protection law consumer (Cet. ke-2). Ghalia Indonesia.

Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2017). Protection law consumer (Cet. ke-10). PT Rajawali Pers.

Mansyur, A., & Rahman, I. (2015). Enforcement of human rights protection law consumer as an effort to improve national production quality. Journal Faculty of Law, Unissula.

Nasution, A. (2014). Protection law consumer: An introduction. Diadet Media.

Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2011). Protection law consumers. Rays Graphics.

Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2014). Protection law consumers. Sinar Graphics.

Harianto, D. (2016). Legal protection for consumers against misleading advertisements. Ghalia Indonesia.

Ikhwansyah, I. (2010). Business competition law in implementation and practice. Unpad Pres.

Sidabalok, J. (2014). Protection law consumers in Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Tandjung, J. W. (2014). Marketing management approach to customer values (Cet. ke-2). Bayumedia Publishing.

Tobing, R. D. (2015). Law, consumers, and society. Laks Bang Mediatama.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Factors that influence law enforcement. PT Raja Grafindo.

Nugroho, S. A. (2011). Completion process dispute consumer reviewed from procedural law and constraints its implementation. Kencana Perdana Media Group.

Sasongko, W. (2017). Terms and conditions principles of protection law consumers. University of Lampung.

Sonata, D. L. (2014). Method normative and empirical legal research: Typical characteristics of method legal research. Fiat Justitia Journal Legal Science, 8(1), 25.

Darnela, L., & Saraspeni, W. (2017). Protection consumer on the right to price information on food menus in perspective Constitution Number 8 of 1999 concerning protection consumers (Study case in food stall in Malioboro area). Journal Faculty of Law Sharia and Law of Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University of Yogyakarta, 171–173.

Kristanto, E. (2014). The role of BPSK (Dispute Settlement Agency) dispute consumers in finishing dispute consumer through the mediation process in Yogyakarta. Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta, 3–4.

Rinaldi. (2019). The role of the settlement agency dispute consumers (BPSK) of Payakumbuh city to dispute consumer. Journal Legal Scholar, 4(2).

Decree of the Minister of Trade and Industry No. 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001.

BPSK Decision Number 072/Arbitration/2022/BPSK.Mdn.

Constitution Number 8 of 1999 concerning Protection Consumer.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-11

How to Cite

Andreas Marfel Silaban, & Beby Sendy. (2025). Legal Review of Consumer Dispute Settlement in Cases of Cancelled Property Development : Study Decision Number : 072/ Arbitration /2022/ BPSK.Mdn. International Journal of Law and Society, 2(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.412