The Legal Protection of Patients as a Victim of Medical Malpractice by Physicians on Telemedicine Services


  • Egun Nofianto Universitas Bung Karno



Telemedicine, Medical Malpractice, Health Law


The development of health services has developed in the last few years and continues to grow to the point of giving rise to telemedicine as a term for electronic services medium between patients and health service providers. The purpose of this research is to find the formal legal truth on the protection rights of a patient who used telemedicine services based on the Indonesian Civil Code, Health Law, and other relevant legal material sources, the study aims to determine the legal certainty of the patient using telemedicine services and legal remedies available to patients injured due to telemedicine malpractice. The research method used is normative or doctrinal and involves relevant approaches such as the statute approach, conceptual approach, theoretical approach, and analytical approach which use various legal material sources including primary and secondary legal material, particularly such as legislation, regulation, various legal theories, legal principles, doctrine, and scientific works of scholars including journals, articles, and practice guides.


Agustina, Rosa et al, Hukum Perikatan (Law of Obligations), Jakarta:Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Leiden, Universitas Groningen, 2012.

Al-Farouqi S, Akhmad, “The pros and cons of arbitration: a study of International arbitration with the perspective of Indonesian and Korean law”, Lex Renaissance, vol. 2, no. 2 (2019), pp 231-247.

Bal, Bhajanjit Sonny, “An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States”, Clinical orthopedics and related research, vol. 467, no. 2 (2009), p.340.

Dahlan, Periksa Sofwan, Hukum Kesehatan Rambu-Rambu Bagi Profesi Dokter, Semarang: BP UNDIP, 2000.

Efendi, Jonaedi and Johnny Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris, Jakarta:Kencana, 2016.

Gautama, Sudargo, Essays in Indonesian Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti 1991.

Gilkis, Krystyna Blokhina, “Alternative Disput Resolution”,, 8 June 2017,, accessed 12 July 2021.

Hutchinson, Terry & Duncan, Nigel, “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research” Deakin Law Review., vol. 17, no. 1 (2012) 17. p.83-119.

Kay, Misha, Jonathan Santos, and Marina Takane, Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009, Geneva: WHO Press, 2010.

Kurnia, Pery, “The Application of Strict Liability and Vicarious Liability Principles in The Corporate Responsibility System in Corruption Criminal Cases in Indonesia” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), vol 5, no 3 (2022).

Mills, Karen, Rininta Ayunina and Dioputra Ilham Oepangat, KarimSyah Law Firm, “Litigation and enforcement in Indonesia: an overview”,, 1 April 2020,, accessed 12 July 2021.

Poernomo, Bambang, Hukum Kesehatan, Yogyakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana IKM Universitas Gajah Mada, 1988.

Smith, Hubert W., Kesalahan Dokter atau Tindak Malpraktik, Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC, 2008.

Tim Komunikasi Publik GT Nasional “Melalui Layanan Telemedicine, Masyarakat Tak Perlu ke Rumah Sakit”, (27 April 2020),, accessed 25 Oct 2020.

Winarta, Frans Hendra, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa-Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia & Internasional, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika Offset, 2011.

World Health Organization “10 facts on patient safety”, who. int, 6 August 2019,, accessed 24 Oct 2020.



How to Cite

Egun Nofianto. (2024). The Legal Protection of Patients as a Victim of Medical Malpractice by Physicians on Telemedicine Services. International Journal of Law and Society, 1(3), 58–71.