Coaching Without Going Through the Court Against Suspected Jarimah Violators By Satpol PP and Wh Lhokseumawe

Authors

  • Dirmawan Suryadi Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Mohd. Din Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Ali Abubakar Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i3.667

Keywords:

Guidance, Jarimah Offenders, Judicial Process, Lhokseumawe

Abstract

In Aceh, the provision of guidance is regulated in Articles 5 and 6 of Gubenur Regulation Number 139 of 2016, which states that the main task and function of the Civil Service Police Unit and Wilayatul Hisbah Aceh is the guidance function. Article 1 point 14 of Qanun Number 7 Year 2013 on Jinayat Procedure Law states that the function of Wilayatul Hisbah (WH) is to socialise, supervise, enforce, and foster the implementation of Islamic Sharia. Therefore, there is a problem of interpreting the authority of coaching carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City. This study aims to determine the legal basis for the coaching of suspected jarimah violators by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City and the legal consequences of coaching suspected jarimah violators without going through the judicial process carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City. The research method used is empirical juridical. Data sources are obtained through interviews with respondents and informants. The results of this study indicate that the coaching carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe city against suspected jarimah violators does not have a clear legal basis. The coaching carried out is only based on a statement signed by the alleged jarimah violator during the investigation and the legal consequences of coaching against jarimah offenders by Satpol PP and WH of Lhoseumawe City without going through the judicial process is carried out without a legal basis which results in serious legal consequences such as the coaching is not legally valid (can be cancelled), violates human rights, and can be sued civilly or criminally prosecuted and reduces public confidence in Sharia law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Aziz Hakim, State Law and Democracy in Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Student Library, 2021.

Budi Setiawan, J., “KPK's Authority in Investigating and Prosecuting Koneksitas Crimes: A Criminal Law Perspective,” De Jure Journal of Legal Research, pp. 167–184.

Dey Ravena and Kristian, Criminal Policy, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2017.

Humaira Sartika, “The Supervisory Role of the Civil Service Police Unit and Wilayatul Hisbah in Enforcing Jarimah Khamar According to Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayah Law in Central Aceh,” Faculty of Shari'ah and Law, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Banda Aceh.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, The Development of Indonesian Constitutional Law after Reform, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Kamarusdiana, “Qanun Jinayah Aceh in the Perspective of Indonesian Rule of Law,” Al-Ahkam Journal, vol. 17, no. 2.

Mul Irawan, Strengthening the Implementation of Jinayat Courts in Aceh in the Perspective of Integrated Criminal Justice System in Strengthening the Implementation of the Authority of the Syar'iyah Court in Settling Jinayat Cases in Aceh Province, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2019.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, The Science of Indonesian Law, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Library, 2019.

Muladi, A., The Complexity of Handling Connectivity Cases in Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2020.

Satjipto Rahardjo, The Science of Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2020.

Soerjono Soekanto, Factors Affecting Law Enforcement, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Susanto, B., “The Role of the KPK in Handling Connectivity Cases: A Case Study of Corruption Cases Involving Military Officials,” Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 345–362, 2020.

Sudarsono, M. T., “KPK's Authority in Handling Koneksitas Cases: A KUHAP Perspective,” Journal of Law and Justice, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 207–217, 2021.

Suryanto, A., “Political Interference in Anti-Corruption Efforts: Lessons From Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Political Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 34–40, 2020.

Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Pamudji, Normative Legal Research, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011.

Soehino, Corruption: Theories of Causes, Prevention and Enforcement, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Vivi Ariyanti, “Law Enforcement Policy in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia,” Yuridis Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, 2011.

Law No. 11/2006 on the Government of Aceh.

Aceh Qanun Number 7 Year 2013 on Jinayat Procedure Law.

Qanun Number 6 Year 2014 on Jinaya Law.

Aceh Governor Regulation No. 139/2016 on the Position, Organisational Structure, Duties, Functions and Work Procedures of the Aceh Civil Service Police Unit and Wilayatul Hisbah.

Khairiah, Investigator of Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Dirmawan Suryadi, Mohd. Din, & Ali Abubakar. (2025). Coaching Without Going Through the Court Against Suspected Jarimah Violators By Satpol PP and Wh Lhokseumawe. International Journal of Law and Society, 2(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i3.667