Global Terrorism and Human Rights in Indonesia: Conflict Between Security and Freedom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.676Keywords:
civil liberties, counter-terrorism, Global terrorism, human rights, security policiesAbstract
The escalation of global terrorism has posed substantial obstacles to the safeguarding of human rights globally. This study analyzes the intricate relationship between counter-terrorism strategies and human rights, highlighting how security policies may curtail individual liberties. This study conducts a comprehensive examination of several case studies to examine the effects of anti-terrorism laws and procedures in different nations. It further examines the intricate equilibrium that governments must sustain between safeguarding national security and preserving human rights norms. The study utilizes qualitative methodologies, encompassing document analysis and expert interviews in the domain. The findings indicate that although counter-terrorism initiatives are essential for public safety, they frequently lead to infringements of civil liberties, especially impacting underprivileged communities. The paper emphasizes the necessity of tackling these difficulties to guarantee that security measures do not excessively violate basic rights.The report concludes by recommending measures for policymakers to enhance human rights protections within counter-terrorism frameworks. Essential recommendations encompass promoting accountability and transparency in security operations while implementing equitable, non-discriminatory rules. Through the implementation of these measures, governments can proficiently counter terrorism while upholding fundamental human rights principles.
Downloads
References
] Amnesty International, Human Rights in the Age of Terrorism, London: Amnesty International Publications, 2019.
] Atmasasmita, R., Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Perspektif Hukum Internasional, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas, 2007.
] Cardenas, S., “National human rights commissions in Asia,” in Sovereignty under Challenge, Routledge, pp. 55–82, 2017.
] Clark, A. M., Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
] Hoffman, B., Inside Terrorism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.
] Human Rights Watch, World Report 2021: Events of 2020, New York: Human Rights Watch, 2021.
] Karns, M. P., Mingst, K. A., and Stiles, K. W., International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2015.
] Neuman, M. and Weissbrodt, D., “Human rights and counter-terrorism,” Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 873–888, 2004.
] Octaviani, R., and Febrian, S., “Penerapan prinsip humanitarian intervention sebagai cara penyelesaian konflik bersenjata internasional dikaitkan dengan kedaulatan negara,” Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–70, 2018.
] Price, M., Gohdes, A., Ball, P., Dukich, M., Dukich, C., Kheir, A., Mohamed, A., Osman, M., and Qtiesh, A., Updated Statistical Analysis of Documentation of Killings in the Syrian Arab Republic, 2014.
] Suteja, J. A., “Penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran HAM dalam kebijakan anti-terorisme di Indonesia,” Jurnal HAM, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 112–125, 2020.
] United Nations, The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, New York: United Nations, 2015.
] Wajdi, F., “AS dan Terorisme,” Jurnal Politik dan Dakwah Al-Daulah, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11, 2000.
] Zallum, A. Q., Persepsi-Persepsi Berbahaya, Bangil: Pustaka Thariqul Izzah, 1998.
] Zallum, A. Q., Slogan-Slogan Serangan Amerika Terhadap Islam, Bangil: Pustaka Thariqul Izzah, 1996.
] Zedner, L., “Pre-crime and post-crime: The new politics of security,” Criminal Justice, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 153–174, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
