Collaborative Governance: the Role of the House of Representatives in the Relocation of Bong Suwung Localization, Yogyakarta City

Nailul Himam; Sugiyanto Sugiyanto

doi:10.62951/ijls.v2i3.697

Authors

Nailul Himam Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD"
Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i3.697

Keywords:

Regional People's Representative Council, Collaborative Governance, Localization

Abstract

The issue of prostitution in Yogyakarta, especially in the Bong Suwung area, reflects the complexity that involves social, economic, and legal aspects. Despite regulations, prostitution practices continue to increase, presenting challenges in law enforcement and individual protection. The process of relocating Bong Suwung by PT KAI faced protests from residents who felt they were not treated fairly. In this context, the application of the concept of Collaborative Governance is important, with collaboration between the DPRD, local governments, and the community to achieve more humane and equitable solutions. The DPRD plays a role as a mediator, accommodating the aspirations of the community and ensuring transparency in the relocation process. This research shows that success in addressing prostitution and relocation issues is highly dependent on the collaborative capabilities of various actors, as well as the application of Collaborative Governance principles to create responsive public policies and reduce potential conflicts

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.

C. Ansell and A. Gash, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance, pp. 1–29, 2007, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.

N. C. Bormann and M. Golder, “Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946–2011,” Electoral Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 360–369, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.005.

M. Chumairo, N. D. Masyithoh, and A. H. Adila, “Criminal Policy for Users of Services Prostitution to Achieve Substantial Justice,” Walisongo Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 129, 2021, doi: 10.21580/walrev/2021.3.1.9074.

N. L. Y. Dewi, “Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Public Policy Studies,” Scientific Journal of Social Dynamics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019.

W. N. Dunn, Policy Analysis in the Policymaking Process, in Public Policy Analysis, pp. 30–65, 2018, doi: 10.4324/9781315181226-2.

M. Hidayat and Sa'idah, “Illegal Housing and Localization of Prostitution in the Special Region of Yogyakarta: A Study on Bong Suwung and Flower Markets,” J. Sos. and Mbang. Kota, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2023.

J. O’Flynn and J. Wanna, Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia?, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_458884

C. V. Patton, D. S. Sawicki, and J. J. Clark, Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315664736.

A. Pradana, “A Review of Criminal Law on Prostitution and Criminal Liability of Parties Involved in Prostitution,” J. Huk. Scumbags., vol. 42, no. 2, p. 276, 2015, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol45.no2.5.

K. Schmeer, Guidelines for Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis - Health Reform Tools Series, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform, 1999.

C. Silvia, “Collaborative Governance Concepts for Successful Network Leadership,” State and Local Government Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2011. [Online]. Available: SAGE Publications.

A. M. Thomson and J. L. Perry, “Collaboration processes: Inside the black box,” Public Administration Review, vol. 66, suppl. 1, pp. 20–32, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.

Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, 2014.

D. L. Weimer and A. R. Vining, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315442129.