Juridical Review of The Legal Responsibility of Perpetrators of Corruption Offences in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v1i3.71Keywords:
Corruption, Crime, Criminal OffenceAbstract
In the recent reform era, there has been no effective effort to eradicate corruption. This is particularly ironic, given that the goal of reform is to eradicate corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN). It also shows that more democratic governments are not serious about eradicating corruption. The crime of corruption in Indonesia has been increasing year by year. Corruption has become an extraordinary crime. Thus, efforts to eradicate it can no longer be done in an ordinary way, but are required in an extraordinary way. Corruption can pose a danger to the life of mankind, because it has penetrated the world of education, health, provision of food for the people, religion, and other social service functions. The difficulty of overcoming corruption can be seen from the number of acquittals of defendants in corruption cases or the lack of punishment borne by defendants who are not proportional to what they have done. This is very detrimental to the State and hampers the development of the nation. In this case, corruption cases are also difficult to disclose because the perpetrators use sophisticated equipment and are usually committed by more than one person in a covert and organised situation. Overcoming corruption requires measures such as improving the system, including improving the applicable laws and regulations, improving the way government works, strictly separating state ownership and private ownership, enforcing professional ethics and institutional discipline, applying the principles of good governance and optimising the use of technology and improving human beings, including improving human morals as believers, improving legal awareness, increasing legal awareness, electing leaders who are clean, honest and anti-corruption.Downloads
References
Book
Aruan Sukisdjo dan Bambang Poernomo, 1990, Seri Hukum Pidana, Hukum Pidana Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia B Sudarso, 1990, Korupsi di Indonesia, Karya Bratara Aksara, Jakarta.
Hamzah Andi dan Siti Rahayu ,1983, Suatu Tinjauan Ringkas Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Akademi Pressindo, Jakarta.
Hartati Evi, 2005, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
H. Setiyono, 2005, Kejahatan Korporasi, Penerbit PT, Bayu Media, Malang. Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia (Normatif, Teoretis,Praktis dan Masalah) Alumni, Bandung.
Maheka Arya, 2006, Mengenali dan Memberantas Korupsi. Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Muliadi, 2000, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Muliatno Sindudarmoko dan Sofyan Syafri Harahap, 2001, Ekonomi Korupsi, Pustaka Quantum, Jakarta.
Saleh Roeslan, 1982, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru
Peraturan Perundang – Undangan
Kitab Undan-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek Van Strafrecht).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana No. 8 Tahun 1981 Undang-Undang No. 24 Prp. tahun 1960.
Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 1971.
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999.
Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999.
Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001
Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002, tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang selanjutnya disebut KPK, Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Law and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.