Khawarij and Murji'ah in the Perspective of Contemporary Islamic Thought: Relevance and Challenges in the Modern Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i4.806Keywords:
Contemporary Islamic Thought, Extremism, Khawarij, Moderation, Murji'ahAbstract
This research examines the thought of Khawarij and Murji'ah in contemporary Islamic context with a focus on the relevance and application of these historical theological concepts to issues of extremism and moderation in the modern era. Through a qualitative approach with library research method, this study analyzes the doctrines of both groups and contemporary manifestations of their thinking. The results show that contemporary religious extremism phenomena have ideological connections with classical Khawarij characteristics such as takfirism, textual literalism, and tendency toward violence, while excessive political apathy reflects similarities with Murji'ah. The main challenges identified are how to balance religious commitment with tolerance in plural societies, and to overcome extreme tendencies in religious interpretation. In conclusion, a deep understanding of the historical roots of this thought can contribute to the development of a comprehensive approach to religious moderation in the modern era, with significant implications for social harmony and deradicalization efforts.
Downloads
References
al-Baghdadi, A. (1998). Al-Farq bayna al-Firaq. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
al-Shahrastani, M. (1992). Al-Milal wa al-Nihal. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Bayat, A. (2007). Making Islam democratic: Social movements and the post-Islamist turn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bunzel, C. (2015). From paper state to caliphate: The ideology of the Islamic State. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Duderija, A. (2011). Constructing a religiously ideal “believer” and “woman” in Islam: Neo-traditional Salafi and progressive Muslims’ methods of interpretation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Esack, F. (1997). Qur’an, liberation and pluralism: An Islamic perspective of interreligious solidarity against oppression. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Hamzah, M. (2018). Khawarij dan Murji’ah: Perspektif ilmu kalam. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 17(1), 1–19.
Hefner, R. W. (2016). Schooling Islam: The culture and politics of modern Muslim education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hegghammer, T. (2020). The caravan: Abdallah Azzam and the rise of global jihad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hussain, G. (2018). Digital caliphate: Internet as battlespace. London: Oxford Research Group.
Ibrahim, A. (2020). Ekstremisme dalam pemikiran Islam kontemporer: Tantangan dan solusi. Jurnal Studi Islam, 15(2), 45–62.
Izutsu, T. (2002). The concept of belief in Islamic theology. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
Kamali, M. H. (2015). The middle path of moderation in Islam: The Qur’anic principle of wasatiyyah. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenney, J. T. (2006). Muslim rebels: Kharijites and the politics of extremism in Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koehler, D. (2017). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. New York, NY: Routledge.
Maher, S. (2016). Salafi-jihadism: The history of an idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramadan, T. (2004). Western Muslims and the future of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramadan, T. (2009). Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sonn, T. (2010). Islam: A brief history. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Watt, W. M. (1973). The formative period of Islamic thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Watt, W. M. (1998). Islamic creeds: A selection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
