Corporate Liability for Air Pollution Based on Strict Liability in Indonesia: A Study of the Absence of Standards for Measuring Non-Material Damages

Authors

  • Faliani Zaliaokta Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Distya Rahma Fauzia Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Livia Fajarisalfa Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Siti Maharani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v3i2.863

Keywords:

Air pollution, Environmental compensation, Environmental Law, Non-Material Damages, Strict Liability

Abstract

Air pollution constitutes a significant environmental problem with far-reaching impacts on public health, quality of life, and ecosystem sustainability, particularly in urban areas and industrial zones in Indonesia. Although the national environmental legal framework has adopted the principle of strict liability through Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, its implementation in air pollution cases continues to face substantial challenges, especially with regard to the proof and assessment of non-material damages. Non-material damages such as disturbances to living comfort, deterioration of environmental quality, psychological stress, and health-related anxiety are intangible in nature and lack clear measurement standards, resulting in their frequent exclusion or inadequate consideration in environmental civil litigation. This study aims to analyze the legal basis for the application of the strict liability principle to air pollution cases in Indonesia, identify relevant forms of non-material damage, and examine the implications of the absence of standardized methods for assessing such damages on legal certainty and the effectiveness of corporate liability enforcement. The research employs a normative legal research method with a library-based approach, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method, drawing upon legislation, court decisions, and scholarly literature on environmental law and environmental damage valuation. The findings indicate that the absence of standardized criteria for assessing non-material damages leads to evidentiary difficulties, inconsistent court decisions, and a weakened deterrent effect on polluting corporations, thereby preventing the full realization of victims’ rights to effective remedies. This study underscores the urgency of developing an integrated national technical guideline for the assessment of non-material environmental damages based on scientifically grounded valuation methods, as well as the need for cross-institutional policy harmonization to strengthen legal certainty, access to justice for affected communities, and corporate accountability in controlling air pollution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, A. U., Munawaroh, A. L., Rosinta, A., Sulistiyani, A. T., Ardianta, I., & Iresha, F. M. (2025). Environmental health risks and impacts of PM2.5 exposure on human health in residential areas, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Toxicology Reports, 14, 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101949

Adilasari, P. L., Setiani, O., & Raharjo, M. (2025). Association between PM2.5 and PM10 with acute respiratory infection in North and East Jakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10531

Anam, K. (2020). Penyelesaian sengketa pencemaran lingkungan oleh korporasi berdasarkan pertanggungjawaban mutlak di Indonesia. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 26(10).

Ardiansyah, A. F., Rizqathallah, M. R., & Saputra, R. R. (2024). Prinsip pertanggungjawaban mutlak akibat perbuatan melawan hukum dalam sengketa pencemaran lingkungan. Media Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 197–204.

Aryanda, A. D., Putra, M. R. W. A., Nugraheni, P. D., & Sulistianingsih, D. (2024). Sanksi korporasi pencemar lingkungan dan perlindungan pejuang lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Hukum Progresif, 3(1), 25–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/hp.v3i1.199

Karindradevi, M., Ayub, M. S., Putri, N. A., & Agustina, N. L. D. (2025). Penerapan prinsip strict liability dalam kasus tumpahan limbah B3 di Kabupaten Bekasi, Jawa Barat. Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 2(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i2.1119

Ndruru, K. D. A. A., & Halawa, D. (2024). Penerapan sanksi perdata dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup ditinjau dari Undang-Undang RI Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 3(2), 38–48.

Nisa, A. N., & Suharno. (2020). Penegakan hukum terhadap permasalahan lingkungan hidup untuk mewujudkan pembangunan berkelanjutan (studi kasus kebakaran hutan di Indonesia). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(2), 295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4i2.337

Nurlaily, N. Y., & Supriyo, A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam kasus pencemaran lingkungan hidup. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i3.14384

Perwira, I., Taufik, G., & Sahder, M. (2022). Valuasi kerugian lingkungan hidup: Studi atas persepsi hakim dalam putusan pengadilan pada 2009–2019. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2). https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/view/619

Putri, R. N., & Sukarsa, D. E. (2024). Court decision regarding environmental compensation costs: Application in environmental restoration. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, 2(1), 2790–2799.

Rahmadi, T. (2011). Gugatan perdata lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 18(3).

Rokhim, A. (2022). Degradasi norma strict liability dalam penegakan hukum lingkungan. Yurispruden, 5(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.14627

Stanford, G. O., Ferreira, S., Landry, C. E., & Blachly, B. (2024). Economic valuation of ecosystem services and natural infrastructure: A quantitative review of the literature. Ecosystem Services, 75, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101754

Suriansyah, S., Handtiyo, S., Sulastri, S., Nurhasanah, I., & Hardyan, O. (2025). Asas strict liability dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup oleh korporasi. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Naratif, 6(2), 234–242.

Syahputri, J., Suarga, E. B., Rahman, I., Zahari, T. N., & Ramdani, D. A. (2023). Impact of air pollution from the transportation sector on health in Indonesia. Policy Note.

Tatyana, N., & Putra, A. R. Y. (2022). Pemenuhan hak atas akses informasi lingkungan hidup dan partisipasi publik terhadap pencemaran udara DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 8(2), 372–401.

Tresnadi, H. (2025). Valuasi komoditas lingkungan berdasarkan contingent valuation method. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 1(1). https://ejournal.brin.go.id/JTL/article/view/3667

Wongkar, E. E. L. T. (2024). Meninjau kembali strict liability: Perkembangan konseptual dan tantangannya dalam ajudikasi lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pro Natura, 1, 1–18.

World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization.

Zahara, S. A., Siregar, A. R. S., & Marniati. (2025). Analisis mendalam bahaya polusi udara dan upaya pencegahan preventif yang efektif. Antigen: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Ilmu Gizi, 3(3), 186–199.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Faliani Zaliaokta, Distya Rahma Fauzia, Livia Fajarisalfa, & Siti Maharani. (2026). Corporate Liability for Air Pollution Based on Strict Liability in Indonesia: A Study of the Absence of Standards for Measuring Non-Material Damages. International Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v3i2.863