The Role of Notaries in Preventing the Misuse of Fintech and Crypto Assets for Money Laundering: Risk Analysis and Required Due Diligence Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v3i1.874Keywords:
Crypto Assets, Due Diligence, Fintech, Money Laundering Crime, NotaryAbstract
The rapid development of financial technology (fintech) and crypto assets has created a paradox in the global financial system: while promoting inclusion and efficiency, it also opens new vulnerabilities for money laundering offenses. Notaries, as public officials and legal professionals involved in various financial and business transactions, are at the forefront of preventing this misuse. This article analyzes the specific risks of money laundering through fintech and crypto assets and formulates the due diligence framework required by notaries in carrying out their preventive functions. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with doctrinal analysis of regulations and international standards, enriched with case studies and best practice references. The findings indicate that notaries face three main challenges: (1) difficulty in identifying parties in virtual transactions, (2) the volatility and relative anonymity of crypto assets, and (3) the gap between the speed of technological innovation and regulatory adaptation. This article proposes an Enhanced Digital Due Diligence (ED3) model that integrates digital verification technology, blockchain forensic analysis, and a dynamic risk-based approach. This framework is expected to strengthen the role of notaries as gatekeepers in the rapidly evolving digital financial ecosystem while maintaining the profession's relevance in the era of digital transformation.
Downloads
References
Alamsyah, M. M. D. F. (2023). Three-layer risk analysis of cryptocurrency money laundering. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Regulation Journal, 4(2), 45-67.
Anggraeni, T. W. (2021). Crypto asset regulation in Indonesia: Between consumer protection and crime prevention. Indonesian Legislation Journal, 18(4), 511-530.
Asshiddiqie, M. A. R. (2023). Smart contracts in notarial transactions: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Law and Technology, 5(1), 1-24.
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (2020). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press.
Caroline, D. R. (2023). Integrated reporting systems for notaries in the digital age: Design principles and legal requirements. Journal of Legal Information Systems, 10(2), 134-156.
de Bruijn, J., & van der Waals, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of notarial due diligence in digital transactions: Netherlands, France, and Indonesia. European Journal of Law and Technology, 12(1), 1-25.
FATF. (2022). Targeted update on implementation of FATF standards on virtual assets and VASPs. FATF.
Fauzan, S. M. A. (2023). Blockchain-based digital identity for enhanced KYC in legal professions. Journal of Law and Digital Economy, 3(2), 89-112.
Fenwick, M., Vermeulen, E. P. M., & Corrales, M. (2021). Techno-legal certainty in the digital economy. European Business Law Review, 32(2), 217-240.
Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. FATF.
Firmansyah, M. A. (2023). Market capitalization and volatility of crypto assets: 2020-2023 period analysis. Indonesian Digital Economics Journal, 8(1), 22-45.
Gultom, A. R. C. (2024). The future of notarial due diligence: Artificial intelligence and big data analysis. Journal of Future Law, 6(1), 112-134.
Hakim, A. R. (2022). Bank Indonesia digital payment regulations in consumer protection and TPPU prevention framework. Indonesian Banking Journal, 25(2), 156-175.
Hardianto, S. (2023). Legal education curriculum in the digital era: Financial technology integration. Legal Education Journal, 11(3), 456-478.
Hartono, B. S. (2023). Regulatory arbitrage in cryptocurrency transactions: Implications for Indonesian notaries. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 20(3), 445-468.
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2022). Technological characteristics of cryptocurrencies and money laundering vulnerabilities. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 112-128.
Kurniawan, D., & Sari, R. (2022). Implementation of know your customer principles among notaries: Study in Jakarta and Surabaya cities. Business Law Journal, 40(3), 301-322.
Lee, K. O. (2022). Beneficial ownership transparency in Southeast Asian fintech companies: A regulatory gap analysis. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 17(1), 134-156.
Morgan, L. P. (2022). Dynamic risk assessment for digital assets: A framework for legal gatekeepers. Risk Management and Compliance Journal, 15(4), 301-325.
Nasution, R. P. S. (2023). Crypto asset regulatory arbitrage and its impact on global TPPU prevention. International Law Journal, 19(1), 89-110.
Pramono, A. S. (2021). Digital transformation of financial sector and its regulatory implications in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Devel-opment, 51(2), 345-367.
Prasetyo, R. E. (2024). Integrated fintech regulatory policies for TPPU prevention. Public Policy Journal, 17(1), 67-89.
Puspitasari, R. D., & Nugroho, F. A. (2024). Digital capacity of Indonesian notaries: 2023 national survey results. Indonesian Legal Education Journal, 9(1), 77-98.
Santoso, B. (2020). Notary obligations in preventing money laundering crimes in Indonesia. Notarial Journal, 15(1), 1-18.
Simatupang, T. H. (2022). TPPU modus operandi through digital wallets in property transactions. Indonesian Criminology Journal, 18(1), 55-78.
Situmorang, A. B. (2023). Legal compliance review of smart contracts: A notarial perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, 1-15.
Smith, J. K. (2024). Blockchain forensic analysis for legal professionals: Tools and techniques. Journal of Digital Forensics and Law, 8(1), 23-47.
Tampubolon, S. F. M. (2023). Integration of fintech regulations and legal profession obligations in TPPU prevention in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Science, 16(2), 223-245.
Tobing, E. S. M. L. (2022). Notarial professional secrecy versus TPPU reporting obligations: Normative conflict analysis. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 29(2), 267-289.
van Rossum, H. (2021). The notary as gatekeeper in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 28(2), 145-167.
Wang, L., & Chen, H. (2023). Decentralized finance (DeFi) and anti-money laundering: A new frontier for financial regulation. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 6(1), 78-102.
Wardhana, G. P. S. (2023). Fund layering through fintech platforms for property transactions: Bali case study. Property Law Journal, 11(3), 401-420.
Wijaya, A. (2021). Implementation of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 37 of 2018 for notaries: Two-year implementation evaluation. Notary Journal, 7(2), 189-210.
Wijaya, R., & Putri, S. A. (2022). Pseudonymity in blockchain: Money laundering risk analysis. Journal of Technology and Law, 12(3), 89-112.
Wirawan, I. G. A. P. (2023). The role of notary professional organizations in the digital transformation era. Journal of Legal Professional Organizations, 14(2), 178-199.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

