Legal Consequences of the Non-Functioning of Contradictoire Delimitatie in the Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.713Keywords:
Contradictoire Delimitatie, Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL), Land Boundary Disputes, Legal Consequences, Land Measurement and MappingAbstract
Measurement is a crucial initial step in the land registration process, as stipulated in Article 19 paragraph (2) letter a of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). Article 17 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration emphasizes that measurements must be supported by physical data and boundary arrangements based on the agreement of adjacent landowners. One key principle in this process is the contradictoire delimitatie principle, which requires the presence of interested parties during the determination of land boundaries. This thesis aims to analyze the function of contradictoire delimitatie in the measurement results of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL), as well as to examine the legal consequences if this principle is not implemented. The study is expected to contribute to the development of legal knowledge in the field of land affairs and serve as a reference for academics, legal practitioners, judicial institutions, law enforcement officials, and land authorities. In practice, if the subject of a land parcel is unknown, information is obtained from neighboring landowners, community leaders, or relevant officials, and recorded in the Measurement Sketch (Gambar Ukur or GU). If boundary agreements have not been reached, dotted lines are used to indicate temporary boundaries. When the Work Map is attached to the GU, the landowner or their representative may sign it as a form of boundary agreement. The absence of the contradictoire delimitatie principle hinders the measurement process, map creation, land registration, and issuance of land rights certificates. Furthermore, unclear or poorly maintained boundaries often lead to overlapping claims and disputes in the field.
Downloads
References
] P. Parlindungan, Komentar Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2013.
] U. Santoso, Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif, Jakarta: Prenada Kencana Media Group, 2012.
] E. S. dkk, “Kebijakan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Tanjung Pinang dalam Mengeluarkan Sertifikat Hak Kepemilikan Permukiman yang di Atas Air,” Jurnal Selat, vol. 7, no. 1, Okt. 2019.
] A. Sutedi, Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
] U. Santoso, Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta: Prenada Kencana Media Group, 2010.
] J. J. Sembiring, Panduan Mengurus Sertipikat Tanah, Jakarta: Visimedia, 2019.
] U. Santoso, Hukum Agraria dan Hak-Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta: Prenada Kencana Media Group, 2008.
] B. A. Chomzah, Hukum Pertanahan, Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2002.
] M. Yamin, Beberapa Dimensi Hukum Agraria, Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2003.
] R. Usman, Hukum Kebendaan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
] K. Muljadi and G. Widjaja, Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Prenada Kencana Media Group, 2005.
] C. Sutedi, Hukum Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
] H. S. Tunggal, Himpunan Peraturan Pendaftaran Tanah, Jakarta: Harvindo, 2008.
] D. Hartono, Panduan Lengkap Hukum Praktis Kepemilikan Tanah, Surabaya: Laksbang Yustisia, 2015.
] M. Yamin, Beberapa Dimensi Filosofis Hukum Agraria, Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press, 2003.
] I. Permadi, Unifikasi dan Pluralisme Hukum Agraria, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010.
] I. Ismail, Konsepsi Hak Garap Atas Tanah, Bandung: Ciptapustaka Media Perintis, 2011.
] M. S. W. Sumardjono, Kebijakan Pertanahanan antara Regulasi dan Implementasi, Jakarta: Kompas, 2005.
] M. Y. Lubis and A. R. Lubis, Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2010.
] M. Wahid, Memaknai Kepastian Hukum Hak Milik Atas Tanah, Jakarta: Republika, 2008.
] S. Mertokusumo, Teori Hukum, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2007.
] S. Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.
] S. Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2012.
] M. Mahfud MD, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.
] S. F. Marbun and M. Mahfud MD, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.
] H. Hadisoeprapto, Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.
] S. Soekanto and S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
] M. Rosyidi, Penuntun Peraturan Pelaksanaan Perundang-Undangan Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.
] L. Marpaung, Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan dan Masalah Prevensinya, Cet. 2, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2004.
] P. M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 2003.
] Shidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2000.
] W. Sasongko, Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2007.
] S. Soekanto and S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
] P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
] E. V. Dicey, Pengantar Studi Hukum Konstitusi (terj.), Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia, 2007.
] Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
] Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
] Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
] Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
] Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria Nomor 35 Tahun 2016 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociology and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
